Prepared for Stanislaus Cardiology Group · 2026 Strategy Review · Confidential — not for distribution
Cardiology Remote Care Service Line · Modesto, California

One Remote Care Service Line.
Margin-Positive From Month Two.

How an independent, interventional-heavy cardiology group turns continuous care for heart failure, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and post-PCI recovery into a billable, margin-positive service line — on Fee-for-Service, in a 58% Medicare Advantage market, with no risk-model exposure.

$0
24-Month Net Reimbursement
$0
24-Month Practice Margin
0
Hospitalizations Avoided
0
Unique Patients in Active Remote Care (Month 24)
Independent · Interventional · Unentangled

2026 Starts From a Position of Strength

This is not a turnaround story. Stanislaus Cardiology enters the remote-care era as an owner-operated, single-specialty group that just invested in its own future — a new ~11,460 sq ft medical office — with a heavily interventional practice and zero risk-model baggage. The strategic question is how to capture the recurring care-management revenue the practice leaves entirely on the table today.

✓ Verified

Independent Single-Specialty Group

Owns its group NPI (1902828841) and a new ~11,460 sq ft office at 3621 Forest Glenn Dr — an independent investment, no PE or MSO rollup on record.

✓ Verified

Heavily Interventional Practice

Four of five cardiologists are FSCAI interventionalists — a high-volume PCI group whose post-procedure and heart-failure patients are the natural remote-monitoring cohort.

★ Whitespace

No Remote-Care Footprint Today

No remote monitoring or care-management program, device clinic, patient app, or telehealth anywhere in the practice — a clean build with no incumbent vendor to displace.

✓ Verified

Fee-for-Service, No Risk Entanglements

Not in an MSSP ACO or shared-savings arrangement on record. Care-management reimbursement accrues cleanly to the practice on Fee-for-Service.

One structural advantage sits underneath all of this: a single practice, a single chart, a single billing layer — exactly the substrate a remote-care service line needs. What's missing is the service line itself: no remote monitoring or care-management program is billed anywhere in the group today.

The Market Signal

Why 2026 Is the Moment — Without Betting on a Risk Model

Three forces make now the right time to stand up a cardiology remote-care service line — and none of them require taking on downside risk.

Market
58.4% MA

A Medicare Advantage Stronghold

Modesto runs roughly 58.4% Medicare Advantage penetration (2025/26), well above the national ~54%. An aging Central Valley panel plus an MA-heavy payer mix is the ideal demand base for continuous cardiac management — the single most important market fact behind this model.

Tailwind
CY2026

Short-Window RPM Is Now Billable

New CY2026 codes 99445 (2–15-day device supply) and 99470 (first 10 minutes of management) make post-PCI and transitional monitoring windows cleanly billable — removing the 16-day floor that previously blocked episodic remote care for interventional patients.

Clean Slate
$0 → Recurring

First-Mover, No Displacement

With no existing remote-care program, every enrolled patient is net-new, recurring professional-fee revenue. No vendor to rip out, no sunk cost, no re-implementation — the whitespace is total.

No mandatory model exposure — pure-upside timing, prepared if selection maps change. The service line is built on clean Fee-for-Service economics, so care-management reimbursement accrues cleanly to the practice today.
Heart Failure
Coronary Artery Disease
Hypertension
Post-PCI / Interventional Recovery
The Operating Model

One Cardiology Service Line, Three Coordinated Programs

A named, governed remote-care service line with its own owner, P&L, and scorecard, following the Medicare cardiac patient between visits across every diagnosis the group manages. CoachCare runs the engine; your physicians govern every clinical decision.

The Cardiology Service Line — RPM + PCM
  • RPM Device-based physiologic monitoring (blood pressure, weight, pulse ox) — the continuous early-warning and titration layer across HF, CAD, and hypertension panels, and the post-PCI recovery surveillance line.
  • PCM Principal Care Management (99426/99427) — the care-management wrapper for the condition this group actually owns: resistant hypertension, coronary disease, heart failure, or cardiovascular disease as a single domain.
Build In-House vs. Partner with CoachCare
  • Devices Cellular BP cuffs, scales, and pulse oximeters — sourced, shipped, configured, and supported by CoachCare, not the practice.
  • Monitoring 24/7 alert triage and health-coach outreach staffed by CoachCare under your protocols — no new clinical FTEs to hire.
  • Enrollment Physician-referral and telephonic outreach handled end to end, so panels fill without adding front-office load.
  • Billing Care-plan coding and monthly claims auto-generated by CoachCare's billing engine — capture without chasing.
Why PCM, not CCM: a specialist's care management is focused on one principal condition — resistant hypertension, coronary disease, heart failure — or on cardiovascular disease as a single domain, which is precisely what Principal Care Management is written for. Chronic Care Management assumes management of all of a patient's conditions, and it is increasingly billed by the patient's primary care practice, or absorbed into a prospective payment there. PCM is the code that fits the specialist's actual scope and does not collide with the PCP's.
The one coordination rule: each patient gets one longitudinal care-management wrapper — PCM on the principal cardiac condition — plus RPM, with one shared care plan in the chart.

The CY2026 Billing Stack

ServiceCodes~CY2026 MagnitudeCardiovascular Use
RPM setup & device supply99453 · 99454 · 99445 (new)~$20 setup · ~$52/mo99445 opens 2–15-day post-PCI windows
RPM treatment management99457 · 99458 · 99470 (new)~$52 + ~$41 add'lMonthly review, titration, escalation
Principal Care Management99426 · 99427~$60 + ~$50 add'lThe principal cardiac condition — HF, CAD, resistant HTN — ≥3 months

National non-facility magnitudes. The Value Analysis below uses MAC-locality rates auto-resolved for zip 95355 (California locality 01112-60).

Direct · Bi-Directional · Native

Native Greenway Integration, In the Chart You Already Use

CoachCare integrates directly and bi-directionally with Greenway — your team enrolls and monitors remote-care patients inside the EHR workflows they already use, with discrete vitals flowing to the chart and claims auto-generated every month. No new system to learn.

Greenway Practice EHR & PM (lean Intergy) One chart & work list Orders & flags Flowsheets / vitals Patient portal Billing workqueues CoachCare Remote care platform Cellular devices 24/7 monitoring Health coaches Enrollment team Billing engine FROM GREENWAY Enrollment flags & trigger orders Patient health history BACK INTO GREENWAY Discrete vitals — in the flowsheet, not PDFs Care summary & compliance documentation Real-time enrollment status Claims — auto-generated, every patient, every month Clinicians never leave Greenway — the program lives in the chart they already use

$2,500 / $0 / $0

Greenway integration setup (one-time), $0 monthly, $0 per-patient — the catalog pricing carried in the Value Analysis. Confirm the Greenway product (Intergy vs Prime Suite) and pricing in contracting.

The only one

CoachCare is the only care-management platform that provides automated claims creation via its billing engine — the reason capture holds as the panel scales.

"Key to achieving a program that is efficient, effective and sustainable is creating a seamless, intuitive user experience for the patient and provider — and that's what our EHR integration accomplishes."

Clinical Governance

Clinical Governance & Escalation

A remote-care service line has to earn its place two ways at once — it must pay for itself, and it must be clinically disciplined enough to protect the practice's standing. In a market where roughly 58% of seniors are in Medicare Advantage, and where quality reputation drives both referrals and plan relationships, a documented escalation protocol is the safety layer beneath the recurring-revenue story, and the operating model behind the ~117 modeled hospitalizations avoided.

One Escalation Engine for RPM & PCM

Every reading — device-based or check-in — routes through a single decision logic, so the same discipline applies across both programs.

1

One decision logic

Every RPM and PCM reading enters the same escalation engine — one set of rules, not two.

2

Critical values escalate first

A critical reading escalates immediately, regardless of whether the patient reports any symptoms.

3

Retake before the practice hears it

A non-critical out-of-range reading triggers a retake and symptom check first, filtering false alarms before anything reaches the practice.

4

A trend is objective

Three consecutive out-of-range readings at least an hour apart (blood pressure, glucose), or three within seven days (heart rate) — not a subjective call.

5

Unreachable is not dropped

If the patient can't be reached: voicemail plus a scheduled callback — and escalation proceeds anyway when a critical value or a trend exists.

6

Every escalation is documented

A complete record is written for each event:

VitalFindingsMethodContactOutcomeFollow-up
The Emergency Pathway — A Hard Safety Guarantee911

An active, emergent symptom reported during any outreach call triggers the emergency pathway:

Chest pain New shortness of breath Stroke signs Syncope Worst-ever headache Sudden swelling
  • Call 911 with the patient still on the line.
  • If the patient refuses — loop in the clinic.
  • If the clinic is unavailable — CoachCare activates 911 itself.
CoachCare's urgent / emergent policy supersedes any local escalation preference.

A recent but no-longer-active symptom (within 72 hours) is handled per the practice's stated preference.

Emergency
911, immediately — the emergency pathway, with the patient on the line.
Non-critical
Routed to a defined practice team member — not the physician by default.
Stable / resolved
Documented as an FYI in the chart — visible, no action required.
Physicians aren't paged for what doesn't need them — signal, not noise.

Post-Discharge Readmission-Prevention Cadence

An ER visit or hospitalization in the last 60 days triggers a fixed three-touch cadence across the highest-risk two weeks. Each touch is documented and escalates on any red flag.

Continuity is built in. If a patient can't be reached, the case escalates to the clinic and re-escalates on a fixed cadence — the practice is notified at every decision point, so no patient falls through the gap.
Day 1–2

Stabilize

Identify precipitating factors · medication reconciliation · confirm PCP / specialist follow-up is booked within 7–14 days · symptom assessment.

Day 5–8

Verify

Confirm medication adherence · re-evaluate triggers · confirm the follow-up appointment was kept · verify labs.

Day 12–14

Reinforce

Medication and risk review · review visit outcomes · symptom re-assessment.

Margin-positive and clinically disciplined. One escalation engine across RPM and PCM, a hard emergency guarantee, and a fixed post-discharge cadence — the discipline that stands behind the outcomes in the Value Analysis below.
CoachCare Value Analysis · Modeled for Stanislaus Cardiology Group

The Value Analysis

A 24-month forecast for the cardiology service line — an estimated ~4,146 total Medicare patients (roughly ~1,711 FFS Part B plus ~2,435 Medicare Advantage, reimbursed at federally-set FFS rates), six referring physicians, one CoachCare-funded on-site enrollment specialist, MAC-locality rates for zip 95355, Greenway integration. The service line is RPM + PCM — physiologic monitoring plus Principal Care Management on the principal cardiac condition. Avoided-hospitalization savings are shown as clinical value, not revenue; they are upside on top of the reimbursement below.

Active Program Enrollments Under Remote Care

Monthly active program enrollments (services), not unique patients — a patient carrying both RPM and PCM is counted in each; the headline stat is unique patients, deduped for ~70% cross-program dual-enrollment · physician referrals (8 / provider / mo across 6 physicians, 80% acceptance) + one CoachCare-funded on-site enrollment specialist + telephonic outreach, net of discharges. RPM reaches its ceiling of 1,089 in month 16; PCM runs to ~692 of a 1,057 ceiling by month 24.

Monthly Economics — Revenue, Fees, Margin

Net reimbursement (after denials, coinsurance bad debt) vs. CoachCare fees including one-time implementation and EMR setup; net to the practice dips to −$3,213 in month 1, turns positive in month 2 (+$4,522), and stays positive thereafter — there is no negative-margin quarter.

24-Month Net Reimbursement Mix

$2,633,300 total across the RPM + PCM cardiology stack.

The Financial Summary

24-month, by programNet reimb.CoachCare feesPractice margin
RPM$1,823,754$1,043,054$780,700
PCM$809,546$442,332$367,214
Implementation & ancillary—$26,464−$26,464
Total, 24 months$2,633,300$1,511,850$1,121,450
By periodNet reimb.CoachCare feesPractice margin
Year 1$713,364$414,220$299,144
Year 2$1,919,936$1,097,630$822,306
24 months$2,633,300$1,511,850$1,121,450
Enrollment, device logistics, 24/7 monitoring, and billing capture are delivered by CoachCare, including an on-site enrollment specialist at CoachCare's expense — embedded value, never subtracted from practice margin.

24-month practice margin: 42.6% of net reimbursement (Year 1 41.9%, Year 2 42.8%). Full model available as a companion workbook.

Scenario Explorer — Build Your Own Forecast

Adjust the assumptions and watch the 24-month forecast recompute live. Census is active program enrollments, not unique patients.
24-mo net reimbursement
$2,633,300
24-mo practice margin
$1,121,450
Active enrollments · M24
1,781
Hospitalizations avoided
~117
46,038

Billed Claims / Units

Recurring, subscription-like professional-fee volume over 24 months.

184,728

Physiologic Readings

A continuous clinical picture of the HF, CAD, and hypertension panels between visits.

~117

Hospitalizations Avoided

≈ $1.76M in avoided acute cost at $15K per admission — clinical value on top of the reimbursement.

10.3

FTE-Years Absorbed

~21,518 care-team hours of monitoring, outreach, and documentation handled by the service line.

Implementation

Chartered in 30 Days.
Enrolling by Day 45.

CoachCare operates as the service line's engine — enrollment outreach, device logistics, 24/7 monitoring, and billing-ready documentation — while Stanislaus physicians govern protocols and every clinical decision. Full-service delivery means launch requires no new headcount; staffing formalizes only as census grows.

0–30 Days

Charter & Configure

Named owner, P&L, scorecard; Greenway integration and billing configuration; protocol sign-off for HF, CAD, hypertension, and post-PCI pathways.

31–90 Days

First Cohorts

Post-PCI / interventional discharges and heart-failure patients enroll first; device logistics and 24/7 monitoring live; first billable claims by day 45.

91–180 Days

Scale the Panel

Full referral engine across all six physicians; the PCM wrapper layered onto the principal-condition panel; monthly scorecard to practice leadership.

181–365 Days

Steady-State Service Line

~1,175 active enrollments by month 12, recurring professional-fee revenue, and a continuous clinical picture of the cardiac panel between visits — scaling toward ~1,897 by month 24.

The Proving Ground

Start Where the Volume Already Is: Post-PCI & Heart Failure

A single-site, interventional-heavy group has one obvious first cohort — the post-procedure and heart-failure patients already flowing through the Forest Glenn office. Concentrating enrollment there lets the practice shake out the workflow on the highest-value patients first.

A cohort-first launch produces the internal evidence — census, capture rate, revenue per patient-month, readmission signal — that makes the full-panel rollout a data decision, not a leap.

Scale path: Prove it on the post-PCI / HF cohort → extend to the broader hypertension and multi-condition panel → steady-state across all six physicians. Same protocols, same Greenway build, zero re-implementation.

The 90-Day First Cohort

Anchor cohort: post-PCI / interventional discharges & heart-failure patients, plus the clinic's hypertension panel
MilestoneTarget
Greenway integration + protocol sign-offDay 30
First billable enrollmentsDay 30–45
Device dispatch + monitoring liveDay 45
Active enrollments by Day 90*~181 patients
Go / scale review with unit economicsDay 90

*Modeled months 1–3 active census (37 → 97 → 181), ramping via physician referral, a CoachCare-funded on-site enrollment specialist, and telephonic outreach.

About CoachCare

The Experience to Get It Right

The service line described on this page runs on infrastructure already proven at national scale.

500,000+

Patients Managed

Over 400 managed conditions for 500,000+ patients.

10,000+

Clinicians on the Platform

Providers running remote care programs day to day.

1,000+

Implementations

Successful program implementations.

5M+

Claims Generated

Care-plan coding and billing behind more than 5 million claims.

100M+

Vitals Recorded

Over 100 million vitals recorded and 4 million+ care actions enabled.

Policy Watch · CMS-1848-P

2027 Proposed Rule Insights

CMS's CY2027 Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule, published July 16, 2026, proposes to reprice remote physiologic monitoring. Here is what it reaches, what it leaves alone, and how the operating model behind this service line absorbs it.

1

The Proposal Is Confined to RPM

CMS's remote-monitoring proposals sit in one code family: RPM. CCM, PCM, and TCM are not part of them. That distinction lands directly on this forecast — PCM carries $809,547 of the modeled $2,633,301 in 24-month net reimbursement, and the TCM touch at discharge is outside the proposal entirely. Neither is in scope.

2

CoachCare Is Building the Contingencies Now

The delivery model has more than one shape, and CoachCare is preparing each so the service line's economics hold wherever the rule settles. One unbundles the program into its parts — SaaS platform, device logistics, and program enablement — priced as components. Another engages CoachCare to run the staffing itself, an MSO-style arrangement in which the practice owns the clinical program and the billing while CoachCare carries the labor model. Neither requires re-architecting the service line described on this page.

3

ACCESS Moves Remote Care to Risk-Based PMPM

Alongside the fee schedule, CMS's ACCESS Model pays remote care as a risk-based per-member-per-month arrangement rather than per code: recurring per-beneficiary payments, half of each one withheld and reconciled against outcome attainment. Cardiometabolic care is among its four clinical tracks. What earns under that structure — controlled pressures, titrated therapy, decompensations caught early — is what this service line is built to produce.

What the Proposal Actually Takes Off This Forecast

This forecast repriced code by code at CMS's CY2027 proposed values, at this practice's own MAC locality rather than national averages. Same enrollment, same phasing plan — only the rates move.

−20.6%
The headline per-code cut — device supply (99454 / 99445), the code the proposal reprices hardest.
→
−9.3%
The RPM patient-year, because device supply is only 32% of it — the management codes barely move.
→
−6.5%
The whole service line, because PCM carries 30.7% of the forecast and is not in scope.
RPM alone — the only code family in scope$1,823,754 over 24 months
−$169,353
−9.3% of RPM
The whole service line — RPM + PCM$2,633,301 over 24 months
−$170,265
−6.5% of the whole

Both bars run on the same dollar scale, so the red slice is nearly the same width in each — the same dollars, measured against a larger base. The empty track on the top bar is the care-management revenue RPM alone does not include.

RPM, retained at CY2027 proposed rates The proposed reduction PCM — not in scope

Repriced at this locality's own geographic adjusters. The RPM reductions fall almost entirely on practice expense, so the untouched work component carries more weight in some localities than others; the same repricing at national rates would be −8.8% on RPM. Of the $170,265, RPM accounts for $169,353 and the care-management arm for $912.

Where the Proposal Lands, Code Family by Code Family

CY2026 versus CMS's published CY2027 proposed values, shown at national non-facility amounts so they can be read against CMS's own tables. This practice's locality-adjusted amounts differ; the repricing above uses the local figures.

Code familyWhat CMS proposedCY2026CY2027 proposedChange
In scope — remote physiologic monitoring
99454 / 99445 · device supplyPractice expense recrosswalked$52.11$41.38−21%
99457 · management, first 20 minDirect practice expense removed$51.77$49.59−4%
99458 · management, each addl 20 minDirect practice expense removed$41.42$40.39−2%
99453 · setup and patient educationCrosswalked; one-time per patient$21.71$20.03−8%
Not in scope — the codes the proposal does not reach
99424–99427 · PCMNo structural change proposed$67.80$67.00−1%
99495 / 99496 · TCMNot addressed by the proposalOutside the remote-monitoring provisions entirely

National non-facility amounts; CY2027 values are CMS's own published proposals in Addendum B of CMS-1848-P. The care-management rows show the lead code in each family; every code in those families moves within about 4% in either direction, which is ordinary annual movement rather than a repricing. The RPM reductions are also phased — section 1848(c)(7) of the Act caps any one code's total-RVU reduction at 19% in a single year, and CMS publishes the affected codes, so CY2027 is a single-digit year for a typical program and the remainder arrives no earlier than CY2028.

None of this is final. CMS-1848-P is a proposed rule. Comments are due September 14, 2026, the final rule is expected in early November, and it takes effect January 1, 2027. CoachCare is leading the advocacy — filing comments, putting the device cost and pricing evidence in front of CMS that the rule itself states the agency does not have, and helping practices file their own. This practice gets the final rates, and the model rerun against them, the week they publish.
Why CoachCare for Stanislaus Cardiology Group

Built for a High-Volume Interventional Practice

Six reasons this fits Stanislaus Cardiology Group specifically, not remote care in general.

Greenway

We run inside the chart you already use

CoachCare integrates directly and bi-directionally with Greenway: your team enrolls and monitors remote-care patients inside the chart it already uses. One record for clinicians, and one workflow for the billing team.

Full service

The model that runs without hiring

Enrollment outreach, the care team, device logistics, 24/7 alert triage and billing preparation are CoachCare's payroll. The practice inherits a running program at a 42.6% practice margin with no hiring cycle. On-site enrollment is our expense, because telephonic outreach converts about 8%.

Governance

The practice stays in charge

The group's cardiologists set the protocols, sign the care plans and make every clinical decision, and claims go out under the group's own entity. CoachCare runs the engine; your physicians govern the care.

High-Advantage market

We work the payer mix on purpose

The market runs 58% Medicare Advantage. The fee-for-service quarter bills per claim every month, and the MA majority is protected by the statutory floor that pays a non-contracted plan no less than original Medicare — recurring professional-fee revenue with no risk-model exposure.

Service line

One spine under the interventional volume

Four of five cardiologists are FSCAI interventionalists, and every high-volume PCI case opens a post-procedure window. One remote care service line — RPM and PCM — turns heart failure, coronary artery disease, hypertension and post-PCI recovery into a single billable spine, with one escalation engine across both.

Clean slate

Nothing to displace

There is no remote monitoring, care-management program, device clinic, patient app or telehealth in the practice today, and the group is in no MSSP ACO or shared-savings arrangement on record. This is a clean build with nothing to displace, so every enrolled patient is net-new recurring revenue.

The ask: a working session to validate the panel against your own chart counts, confirm the clean-slate build, scope the Greenway interface, and set the go-live for the post-PCI and heart-failure cohort.